<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: No thank you, please sit down &#8211; Debating in Cambridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.karsten-wenzlaff.de/2007/10/05/no-thank-you-please-sit-down-debating-in-cambridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.karsten-wenzlaff.de/2007/10/05/no-thank-you-please-sit-down-debating-in-cambridge/</link>
	<description>politics, economics, media in a digital revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Von: richard shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.karsten-wenzlaff.de/2007/10/05/no-thank-you-please-sit-down-debating-in-cambridge/comment-page-1/#comment-82076</link>
		<dc:creator>richard shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.karsten-wenzlaff.de/2007/10/05/no-thank-you-please-sit-down-debating-in-cambridge/#comment-82076</guid>
		<description>Coal burning is an atrocity to nature that must be stopped or at least reduced; natural gas is great but expensive; oil is good, but will probably runout this century, or at least be hoarded to drive costs to impossible heights; wind power is good, if millions and millions of large, 2000kw or better turbines can be built, but can they; nuclear energy is the only practical answer. China and India will probably each build 300 or more plants this century; America should build hundreds (GE, a no-nonsense company, says that they can build plants from first concrete pour to reactor critical in 36 months); the NRC expects 29 license applications within the next three years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coal burning is an atrocity to nature that must be stopped or at least reduced; natural gas is great but expensive; oil is good, but will probably runout this century, or at least be hoarded to drive costs to impossible heights; wind power is good, if millions and millions of large, 2000kw or better turbines can be built, but can they; nuclear energy is the only practical answer. China and India will probably each build 300 or more plants this century; America should build hundreds (GE, a no-nonsense company, says that they can build plants from first concrete pour to reactor critical in 36 months); the NRC expects 29 license applications within the next three years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

